Introduction:-
Thomson Reuters is committed to providing comprehensive coverage of the world`s most important and influential journals to meet its subscribers current awareness and retrospective information retrieval needs. Today Web of Science Cover over 9,000 international and regional journals and book series in every area of the natural sciences, social sciences,art and humanities. But comprehensive does not necessarily mean all-inclusive.
Why Be Selective?
It would appear that, in order to be comprehensive, an index to scientific journal literature might be expected to cover all the scientific journals published. This approach would be not only impractical economically, but as analyses of the scientific literature have shown, unnecessary. It has been demostrated that a relatively small number of journals publish the bulk of significant scientific results. This principle is often referred to as Bradford Law.
In the mid- 1930`s S.C Bradford realized that the core literature for any given scientific discipline was composed of fewer than 1,000 journals. Of these 1,000 journals, there are relatively few with a very strong relevance to the given topic, whereas there are many with a weaker relevance to it.
Those with a weak relevance to the given discipline or topic, however, typically have a strong relevance to some other discipline. thus, the core scientific literature can form itself around various topics, with individual journals becoming more or less relevant depending on the topic.
More recently an analysis of 7,528 journals covered in the 2005 JCR revealed that as few as 300 journals account for more than 50% of what is cited and more than 25% of what is published in them. A core of 3,000of these journals accounts for about 75% of published articles and over 90% of cited articles.
to be continued......
3 comments:
Term Papers:
Thank you for visiting this blog.Our blog help the researchers for writing papers/research and will updating everyday.
useful ? Good, then perhaps we should be reporting all our program too. Where is our report on Anugerah Perpustakaan Cemerlang? Please link the newspaper report , I will be commenting on that...InsyaAllah
Yesterday we did a research presentation among us the PhD students under the supervision of PM Dr Norliya Ahmad Kassim. I was first with my topic on "The roles of Malaysian academic librarians in knowledge production process". I will be using variables from Boyer's Model of scholarship and definition from Gibbons et all (1994).
Next was Moin with his information explosion measured using Balance Score Card. He is one of the big guy in TM Malaysia. Then we got to hear from Haziah Shaari a lecturer from Kedah. She did something on orgn learning. Shamsul the youngest guy came on next and he presented his proposal research on KM process. Che Nab was there to present her study on "effectiveness of digital library on distance learner". Then we have Puan Kamariah Nor Mohd desa The Chief Librarian from UTM Skudai. We are so proud she is there to listen to us. She said she wanted to learn the latest issues in Library science research front. She might be joining us as PhD student, soon! eat your heart out, those professionals in their 50's. Last but not least Pn. Azizah was there to comment and present her thesis proposal. As I had to leave early , so I will have to report her topic later (k?).All in all, I found it quite stimulating discussions. PM Dr Norliya did commented on my topic - she told me that factor analysis should be done on all questionnaire items even though we adopt the questionnaire from another researcher, because there might be differences in terms of culture and samples of respondents. Yeah! ...I can handle that. I would like to suggest to all to encourage mini seminars for PhD and make it known to all about it - so have more people to comment...and I think it should be encourage to have a cross fields seminars, such as library science with engineering...huh?
Post a Comment